Doctors who give health advice to their patients or community that runs counter to the medical establishment face a rare but very real risk of state sanctions, including losing their license to practice.
That could soon change if anti-vaccine activists succeed in getting the Supreme Court to weigh in on how broadly the First Amendment protects doctors’ rights to free speech — an issue that is central to Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Make America Healthy Again movement.
…
“This is a part of a judicial assault on science and public health that basically weaponizes the Covid-19 pandemic for political and ideological benefit,” said Lawrence Gostin, a public health lawyer at Georgetown University. … “I can’t emphasize enough how harmful it is.”
Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.
A Supreme Court decision in favor of broad speech protections for physicians could have far-reaching implications, possibly bolstering Kennedy’s efforts to dismantle long-established public health practices by permitting doctors to speak more freely with patients and to the public about approaches to health care that are outside the mainstream. This includes whether to recommend vaccination.
This is an excerpt. Read the original post here
