Optimal scaling for magic state distillation in quantum computing achieved

Comparison of distillation protocols. The existing protocol exploits a distillation procedure using a fixed code to convert noisy magic states (squares with light color) into a smaller number of higher-quality magic states (squares with darker color), where arbitrary suppression of the error rate of the output magic states is achieved by concatenating this procedure in many rounds; however, the overhead of the number of input magic states per output grows as the required number of concatenations increases for better error suppression. By contrast, our protocol performs this conversion procedure only once, using codes of increasing size to achieve better error suppression. We prove that the development of asymptotically good codes with linear distance (and linear decoding radius with an efficient decoder) enables this single-round error suppression. We further prove that this single-round protocol achieves the constant overhead owing to the non-vanishing rate of our asymptotically good codes and the use of efficient quantum error correction in our conversion procedure rather than post-selection. Alembic and fire icons, OpenMoji under a Creative Commons license CC-BY-SA 4.0. Credit: Nature Physics (2025). DOI: 10.1038/s41567-025-03026-0

Researchers have demonstrated that the theoretically optimal scaling for magic state distillation—a critical bottleneck in fault-tolerant quantum computing—is achievable for qubits, improving on the previous best result by reaching a scaling exponent of exactly zero.

The work, published in Nature Physics, resolves a fundamental open problem that has persisted in the field for years.

“Broadly, I think that building quantum computers is a wonderful and inspiring goal,” Adam Wills, a Ph.D. student at MIT’s Center for Theoretical Physics and lead author of the study, told Phys.org.

“However, it is an extremely challenging goal. Most of the reason we don’t have quantum computers already is the issue of noise. Qubits are extremely fragile and get destroyed by the environment and they have to be protected by some error-correcting code.”

But error correction alone isn’t enough. The codes that protect qubits naturally support only certain operations called Clifford gates, which can’t provide quantum advantage on their own. Implementing the necessary non-Clifford operations in a fault-tolerant manner has remained a major bottleneck.

Magic state distillation, introduced by Bravyi and Kitaev in 2005, addresses this by enabling these operations through specially prepared quantum states. However, the process has remained extremely resource-intensive, with the overhead—the number of noisy input states needed per high-quality output state—growing as error rates decrease.

The magic of quantum computation

Magic in quantum computing is a precisely quantifiable resource, a concept originating from Bravyi and Kitaev’s work. According to their work, universal quantum computation becomes possible when Clifford operations are supplemented with special quantum states called magic states.

Think of all quantum states as a big set. Stabilizer states represent the zone where classical computers can keep up. Magic states lie outside this zone and possess quantum contextuality, an extra resource. This gives quantum computers their advantage over classical systems.

These states can be consumed through a process called gate teleportation to execute the non-Clifford gates necessary for universal quantum computation. For instance, a T gate can be implemented by consuming one magic state using only Clifford operations and measurements.

However, researchers can only produce noisy magic states with relatively high error rates, typically around 10-3, according to Wills. For quantum advantage, error rates need to drop to approximately 10-7, and for large-scale algorithms, rates as low as 10-15 or lower are required.

This is where magic state distillation comes in, the process the team set out to optimize.

Achieving constant overhead

The efficiency of magic state distillation is measured by its overhead: the ratio of input magic states to output magic states needed to achieve a target error rate.

For decades, this overhead has grown as the target error rate decreases, characterized by a scaling exponent called γ (gamma). The smaller the γ, the more efficient the distillation. Achieving γ = 0 means constant overhead regardless of how clean the final states must be.

The field has seen steady progress in reducing this scaling. Hastings and Haah achieved γ ≈ 0.678 in 2017. Krishna and Tillich reached γ → 0 in 2018, but only for quantum systems of ever-growing size with no clear path to practical qubit systems. Wills and his colleagues proved that γ = 0 is possible.

“We demonstrate that constant-overhead magic state distillation is possible,” said Wills. “That means that if you had a quantum computer that was large enough, accurate enough, and running a long enough algorithm, our methods would be the best way to distill magic.”

A two-stage discovery

“Discovering this result really came in two stages, which really came a couple of months apart,” Wills explained. “The first realization was that algebraic geometry codes would be really useful for this problem.”

Previous attempts had used different types of classical error-correcting codes. Hastings and Haah used Reed-Muller codes but couldn’t push below γ ≈ 0.678. Krishna and Tillich used Reed-Solomon codes to approach γ = 0, but their approach required quantum systems of impractically large dimensions.

Algebraic geometry codes, a class of codes from the 1980s, have strong error-correction properties while working with fixed-size quantum systems. This achieved constant overhead for 1024-dimensional qudits (quantum systems with 1,024 levels), not the two-level qubits used in practical quantum computers.

“The second discovery came from reading a textbook from Dan Gottesman, which is still a work in progress,” said Wills. “By going through a relatively obscure chapter, we found that we could realize our qudits as sets of qubits.”

A 1024-dimensional qudit (210 dimensions) can be mathematically represented as 10 qubits (2 × 2 × 2… ten times). This allowed the team to convert their constant-overhead protocol from qudits to qubits. The 10-qubit magic states were converted to standard single-qubit and three-qubit magic states with only a constant-factor overhead loss.

With these two innovations, the team proved that constant overhead (γ = 0) is achievable for qubit systems.

Significance and future work

The result establishes a fundamental theoretical limit: no better asymptotic scaling for magic state distillation overhead is possible. However, Wills emphasized the gap between theory and near-term implementation.

The challenge lies in the actual resource requirements. While the γ = 0 scaling is theoretically optimal, implementing the protocol may require significantly more physical qubits than near-term quantum computers can provide.

Nevertheless, establishing theoretical foundations remains crucial for advancing fault-tolerant quantum computing.

“Developing a solid theory of quantum magic is incredibly important for pushing fault-tolerance further in all regimes, because we know it is essential for universal quantum computation,” he said. “It is quite common to have a very theoretical work like this be followed by multiple more practically-focused works that aim to adapt the ideas to the near-term.”

The team has begun exploring extensions, including Wills’s recent work on transversally addressable gates. Future directions include optimizing constant factors, exploring quantum LDPC code variants, and identifying optimal qudit-to-qubit conversions.

Written for you by our author Tejasri Gururaj, edited by Stephanie Baum, and fact-checked and reviewed by Robert Egan—this article is the result of careful human work. We rely on readers like you to keep independent science journalism alive.
If this reporting matters to you,
please consider a donation (especially monthly).
You’ll get an ad-free account as a thank-you.

More information:
Adam Wills et al, Constant-overhead magic state distillation, Nature Physics (2025). DOI: 10.1038/s41567-025-03026-0. On arXiv: DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2408.07764

© 2025 Science X Network

Citation:
Optimal scaling for magic state distillation in quantum computing achieved (2025, November 12)
retrieved 12 November 2025
from

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.