It’s axiomatic among environmentalists that plastic packaging is a sustainability disaster. Hard science and life-cycle analysis say that’s not true

Plastic packaging can have substantially smaller environmental impacts—including 70% lower greenhouse gas emissions—compared to other packaging materials, according to a new study.

The findings suggest that although there are major concerns about the short use span of single-use plastics and the consequences of improper disposal, in the big picture the strain they cause on the planet may be less than that of reasonable alternatives.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

In the new study, researchers performed a life cycle analysis to compare the environmental impact of packaging …

In [the vast majority of studied comparisons, plastic] was associated with lower greenhouse gas emissions, water scarcity impact, [fossil fuel] and mineral resource use.

The findings can inform debates about regulating single-use plastics or implementing extended producer responsibility (EPR), which requires manufacturers to help cover the cost of recycling or disposing of their products, the researchers argue.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here